Evolution
Microevolution and macroevolution

Evolution is change in heritable traits of biological populations over successive generations.
Evolutionary processes give rise to diversity at every level of biological organisation, including the levels of species, individual organisms, and molecules.
All life on Earth shares a common ancestor known as the last universal ancestor,
which lived approximately 3.5—3.8 billion years ago.
First thing to note is that evolutionists from the world of
mainstream science present their theory as a
fact to the world via their
mainstream media like for example biased Wikipedia. But it should be obvious to anybody with a basic understanding of
science that many of the statements are unprovable by
science simply because they supposedly happened
billions of years ago and are completely unobservable and irrepeatable.
All those bold statements are based on certain assumptions which in case of evolution theory are derived from the philosophy
naturalism.
Evolution is the belief that a life form appeared on the earth and
that that unique first life form changed into all other unique life forms known to us today.
All this supposedly happened merely by means of mindless naturalistic processes without any
purpose in mind. Like in fairy tales or science fiction.
Supposedly this fine-tuned universe
popped into existence from nothingness by mindless
naturalistic processes and then
dead matter turned into living beings to become
mindful and intelligent human life with the ability to ponder all these things.
In order to seemingly support that fantastic story evolutionists say it supposedly happened in incredible amounts of
time which they base on their self-invented philosophy called
uniformitarianism.
But what kind of evidence is there for that fantastic belief system?
There are two kinds of biological evolution, one real and one imaginary. It is essential to understand the fundamental differences between
microevolution and macroevolution because evolutionists themselves tend to ignore and omit them for obvious reasons.
Microevolution

The study of evolution can be performed on different scales. Microevolution reflects changes in DNA sequences and allele frequencies within a species over
time. These changes may be due to
mutations, which can introduce new alleles into a population.
In addition, new alleles can be introduced in a population by gene flow,
which occurs during breeding between two populations that carry unique alleles.
Microevolution encompasses observable changes within a species
which causes variety within that species.
It is limited by the existing genetic makeup of that species. Dogs descended from their ancestor the wolf.
Wolves and dogs have the same features. No dog has ever evolved wings or any other feature not already present in the original genetic makeup of the wolf.
Wolves never evolved into superwolves but they degenerated into inferior dogs largely as the result of
artificial selection. A copy can never be better than its original.
Microevolution shows that new specified information is not added to the existing genetic makeup of an original ancestor naturally.
Therefore one kind does not change into another but rather changes into many variations of itself within the limits of the original genetic makeup of its ancestor.
The driving forces of microevolution are
mutations and selection.
Macroevolution

In contrast with microevolution, macroevolution reflects large-scale changes at the species level, which result from the accumulation of
numerous small changes on the microevolutionary scale. An example of macroevolution is the evolution of a new species.
Macroevolution is the belief that one unique species turned into another and that
it happened by means of mindless naturalistic processes only.
Macroevolution requires the creation and addition of new specified information to the genetic makeup.
This is necessary for the acquisition of new functional features which were not already present in the lifeform.
The first major problem with macroevolution is that nobody ever observed it.
Nobody ever saw a dog evolve into anything but a dog. Or a
fruit fly into anything but a fruit fly. Etcetera.
Therefore it can not even be called science.
It is based on the philosophy naturalism as was adhered to by for example
Charles Darwin and other powerful naturalists who gained in popularity in an ever more materialistic world.
Because there are no examples of macroevolution in observable reality, much of Darwin's theory was built on speculation about the
fossil record. But the fossil record and the
Cambrian explosion show a much different picture of the history of life. Because there exists no
scientific evidence for their unscientific belief evolutionists say that microevolution plus
incredible amounts of time leads to macroevolution. This is called
neo-Darwinism. But in reality
incredible amounts of time only make their theory more unscientific. Also because it is based on the unprovable philosophy
uniformitarianism.
The species problem

Biologists frequently disagree about species, and even argue over how best to define the word species.
Darwin, Mayr, Simpson and others have taught us about species, but none has been broadly convincing on the basic questions of what
the word 'species' means or how we should identify species. For its entire brief history, the field of
evolutionary biology has simply lacked a consensus on these two related questions. Indeed, there was broader consensus before Darwin.
Last year, two papers were published proposing that our ancestors had sex with at least two kinds of archaic humans at two different times and places.
Both Neanderthals and mysterious humans from
Denisova Cave in Siberia interbred with ancient modern humans - and those liaisons produced surviving children,
according to the latest ancient DNA research.
But the researchers avoided the thorny question of species designation and simply referred
to Neandertals, Denisovans, and modern humans as "populations." So were the participants in these prehistoric encounters members of separate species?
Doesn't a species, by definition, breed only with others of that species?
It is remarkable that evolutionists presented a theory of unobservable macroevolution (i.e. speciation) without ever providing a clear definition of a species.
Scientists today still don't agree on how a species is scientifically defined.
This is called the species problem.
This is problematic because people may give their own interpretation of a species in order to support a certain view.
Because the definition of a species is a gray area evolutionists are able to tweak the definition of a species in favor of their preconceived
belief. Just like they deceivingly present evidence of microevolution as evidence for macroevolution.
Another good example is the Neanderthal Man.
Interbreeding of Neanderthals with humans producing offspring is very strong evidence for them simply being of the same species.
Evolutionists always presented Neanderthals as some hairy brute ape-man supposedly being a precursor to modern humans.
They did this of course led by their preconceived belief and in order to promote their monkey theory in this world. It was
wishful thinking, and perhaps worse, namely deceit.
Macroevolution is based on metaphysics, not on
science.
Thomas Hunt Morgan - Evolution and Adaptation (1908)
Duke of Argyll - Organic Evolution Cross-examined (1898)
Stephen C. Meyer, Michael Newton Keas - The Meanings of Evolution
Phillip E. Johnson - What is Darwinism?
True Origin - Five Major Evolutionist Misconceptions about Evolution
Science Against Evolution - Evolution Definition
Science Against Evolution - The Definition of Evolution
Science Against Evolution - Microevolution and Macroevolution
Science Against Evolution - The Species Problem
Douglas H. Erwin - Macroevolution is more than repeated rounds of microevolution
R.C. Lewontin - Confusions About Human Races
Duke of Argyll - Organic Evolution Cross-examined (1898)
Stephen C. Meyer, Michael Newton Keas - The Meanings of Evolution
Phillip E. Johnson - What is Darwinism?
True Origin - Five Major Evolutionist Misconceptions about Evolution
Science Against Evolution - Evolution Definition
Science Against Evolution - The Definition of Evolution
Science Against Evolution - Microevolution and Macroevolution
Science Against Evolution - The Species Problem
Douglas H. Erwin - Macroevolution is more than repeated rounds of microevolution
R.C. Lewontin - Confusions About Human Races