Evolution  Bas Feijen  Contact
Big Bang
The birth of the fine-tuned universe
According to the Big Bang theory, the Universe was once in an extremely hot and dense state which expanded rapidly. This rapid expansion caused the Universe to cool and resulted in its present continuously expanding state. ... There is little evidence regarding the absolute earliest instant of the expansion. Thus, the Big Bang theory cannot and does not provide any explanation for such an initial condition.
Wikipedia - Big Bang
Before the big bang theory came around evolutionists believed in the Steady State theory because it gave them infinite time for their theory of slow and gradual evolution. Cause and effect is a basic tenet of science. If the universe had existed eternally they wouldn't have to explain the first cause of it, which they obviously could never do based on their unprovable philosophy naturalism. And if life had always existed they wouldn't have to explain life coming into existence from dead matter, another dilemma for naturalists. But more and more evidence pointed to a beginning of the universe. This evidence mainly comes from the fields of astronomy and astrophysics starting with Einstein's General Theory of Relativity. The second law of thermodynamics dictates an initial condition of the universe to be of a higher order because entropy shows that the universe is subject to degeneration and would ultimately even perish in so-called heat death. Science can never explain what happened exactly at the point of the creation of this universe, how it happened, and what was there before it. But we do know for sure that the result is this fine-tuned universe.
If we extrapolate this prediction to its extreme, we reach a point when all distances have shrunk to zero. An intitial cosmological singularity therefore forms a past temporal extremity to the universe. We cannot continue physical reasoning, or even the concept of spacetime, through such an extremity. For this reason most cosmologists think of the initial singularity as the beginning of the universe. On this view the big bang represents the creation event; the creation not only of all the matter and energy in the universe, but also of spacetime itself.
Paul Davies - Space-Time Singularities in Cosmology and Black Hole Evaporations
The cosmological singularity defines the starting point of time and history. This is also where science has reached its absolute limit. It shows that the fine-tuned universe with all its specified complexity theoretically originated "from nothing" or at least from an inferior state. It's interesting to note that matter is incredibly, mind-bogglingly empty and that it is over 99.9% empty space. Science is limited and nobody knows what kind of possibly even smaller particles will be found in the future. The visible world is made of the invisible. All matter consists of particles that are made up of even smaller particles and all of them are attracted to each other by means of invisible forces. Everything seems to resolve into energy and nothingness. But how can nothing turn into everything?
1. Whatever begins to exist has a cause.
2. The Universe began to exist.
3. Therefore, the Universe had a cause.
Wikipedia - Cosmological argument
Your browser does not support the video tag.
William Lane Craig - The Kalam Cosmological Argument
Nothing comes from nothing, certainly not by itself. Cause and effect are universal. This is true logical reasoning. This universal reality raises an important question. What caused the fine-tuned universe to pop into existence from nothing? The evolutionary worldview is limited strictly to the unprovable philosophy naturalism and excludes supernaturalism from its pallet of explanations beforehand without any evidence. But nothing comes from nothing. It is impossible to explain the coming into existence of the fine-tuned universe and the natural world by means of naturalism. Cause and effect, a principle of true science, has simply reached a dead end with naturalism. See also Entropy. The logical conclusion follows that the supernatural becomes the best explanation. Belief in God is completely logical and rational.
The curvature of spacetime is directly related to the energy and momentum of whatever matter and radiation are present.
Wikipedia - General relativity
In physics, spacetime is any mathematical model that combines space and time into a single continuum.
Wikipedia - Spacetime
In physics, mass—energy equivalence is the concept that the mass of a body is a measure of its energy content.
Wikipedia - Mass—energy equivalence
Everybody knows Einstein's famous formula E = mc2 and the law of conservation of energy. If the universe full of energy popped into existence then what must have been there before that moment? Some kind of source providing that energy. And what else would be necessary for the creation of a fine-tuned universe fit for life with all its universal laws and specified complexity? Space, time, matter, and energy popped into existence at the same instant in complete harmony. What caused this to happen? Blind and mindless naturalistic processes or mindful intelligent design? The answer is plain and simple, but that answer is not what certain people would like to hear or believe. This has led to some of the most deluded theories to date...
Atheist delusion
Atheists
Atheists
Our universe could have popped into existence 13.7 billion years ago without any divine help whatsoever, researchers say. ... In the very weird world of quantum mechanics, which describes action on a subatomic scale, random fluctuations can produce matter and energy out of nothingness. And this can lead to very big things indeed, researchers say.
Space - The Big Bang Didn't Need God to Start Universe, Researchers Say
The reality is that science can say absolutely nothing about what caused the creation event of the universe. It is far beyond the limits of science. Hence the use of philosophical statements involving the denial of God. Of course the unprovable philosophy naturalism can never account for anything before the natural world simply because there was no natural world. Anybody who believes that something, let alone everything, can come from nothing by means of nothing is simply deluded. Here is what Roger Penrose said about Stephen Hawking's M-theory, which stands symbol for the atheist's neverending quest for the so-called theory of everything, or the atheist's search for the Philosopher's Stone...
Your browser does not support the video tag.
What is referred to as M-theory, isn't even a theory. It's a collection of ideas, hopes, aspirations. ... The book is a bit misleading in that respect.
Roger Penrose - debunks M-theory on Christian Radio
Here's something about Georges Lemaître, the inventor of the big bang theory...
Georges Lemaître
Lemaître first voiced his proposal that the universe had expanded from an initial point, which he called the "primeval atom" or "the Cosmic Egg, exploding at the moment of the creation", a theme he developed further in a report published in the journal "Nature" later that year.
Physics of the Universe - Georges Lemaître
The Cosmic Egg is a mythological motif found in creation myths of many cultures and civilizations. In the Orphic cosmogony, the unaging Chronos produced Aether and Chaos and made in divine Aether a silvery egg, from which everything else appeared. See Arche and The Presocratic Philosophers. Chronos is the god of time which of course also plays a crucial role in the evolutionary belief system. The 'golden womb' or 'golden egg', is the source of the creation of the Universe or the manifested cosmos in Hindu philosophy. See Hiranyagarbha. Georges Lemaître was a Catholic who invented the Big Bang theory calling it a "cosmic egg exploding". Catholicism is literally drenched in all kinds of mythical and pagan traditions and beliefs. Easter eggs for example. Evolution is the egghead religion of atheists.
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Nonsense remains nonsense even if spoken by very clever scientists.
John Lennox - Nothing creates everything?
Extra...
Stephen Hawking - The Beginning of Time
Rich Halvorson - Questioning Cosmological Superstition
Hannes Alfvén - Cosmology: Myth or Science?
Mariano Artigas - The Mind of the Universe
William Lane Craig - The Origins of the Universe: Has Hawking Eliminated God
Science Against Evolution - The Hubble Variable
Earth History - Water everywhere
Videos...
Stephen Hawking co-scientist Roger Penrose debunks M-theory
Henry Schaefer - The Kalam Cosmological Argument (Scientific Evidence)
Evolution  Bas Feijen  Contact