Big Bang
The birth of the fine-tuned universe
According to the Big Bang theory, the Universe was once in an extremely hot and dense state which expanded rapidly.
This rapid expansion caused the Universe to cool and resulted in its present continuously expanding state. ...
There is little evidence regarding the absolute earliest instant of the expansion.
Thus, the Big Bang theory cannot and does not provide any explanation for such an initial condition.
Before the big bang theory came around evolutionists believed in the
Steady State theory because it gave them infinite
time for their theory of slow and gradual
evolution.
Cause and effect is a basic tenet of
science. If the universe had existed eternally they wouldn't have to explain the
first cause of it, which they obviously could never do based on their unprovable philosophy
naturalism.
And if life had always existed they wouldn't have to explain
life coming into existence from dead matter, another dilemma for naturalists.
But more and more evidence pointed to a beginning of the universe. This evidence mainly comes from the fields of
astronomy and
astrophysics starting with Einstein's
General Theory of Relativity.
The second law of thermodynamics
dictates an initial condition of the universe to be of a higher order because
entropy shows that the universe is subject to
degeneration and would ultimately even perish in so-called
heat death.
Science can never explain what happened exactly at the point of the creation of this universe,
how it happened, and what was there before it. But we do know for sure that the result is this
fine-tuned universe.

If we extrapolate this prediction to its extreme, we reach a point when all distances have shrunk to zero.
An intitial cosmological singularity therefore forms a past temporal extremity to the universe.
We cannot continue physical reasoning, or even the concept of spacetime, through such an extremity.
For this reason most cosmologists think of the initial singularity as the beginning of the universe.
On this view the big bang represents the creation event; the creation not only of all the matter
and energy in the universe, but also of spacetime itself.
The cosmological singularity defines
the starting point of time and history. This is also where
science has reached its absolute limit. It shows that the
fine-tuned universe with all its
specified complexity theoretically originated
"from nothing" or at least from an inferior state.
It's interesting to note that matter is incredibly, mind-bogglingly empty and that it is
over 99.9% empty space.
Science is limited and nobody knows what kind of possibly even smaller particles will be found in the future.
The visible world is made of the invisible. All matter consists of particles that are made up of even smaller particles and all of them are
attracted to each other by means of invisible forces. Everything seems to resolve into energy and nothingness.
But how can nothing turn into everything?
1. Whatever begins to exist has a cause.
2. The Universe began to exist.
3. Therefore, the Universe had a cause.
2. The Universe began to exist.
3. Therefore, the Universe had a cause.
Nothing comes from nothing, certainly not by itself.
Cause and effect are universal. This is true
logical reasoning.
This universal reality raises an important question. What caused the
fine-tuned universe to pop into existence from nothing?
The evolutionary worldview is limited strictly to the unprovable philosophy
naturalism and excludes supernaturalism from its pallet of explanations beforehand without any evidence.
But nothing comes from nothing.
It is impossible to explain the coming into existence of the
fine-tuned universe and the natural world by means of naturalism.
Cause and effect, a principle of true
science, has simply reached a dead end with naturalism. See also
Entropy. The logical conclusion follows that the
supernatural becomes the best explanation.
Belief in God is completely logical and rational.

The curvature of spacetime is directly related to the energy and momentum of whatever matter and radiation are present.
In physics, spacetime is any mathematical model that combines space and time into a single
continuum.
In physics, mass—energy equivalence is the concept that the mass of a body is a measure of its energy content.
Everybody knows Einstein's famous formula E = mc2
and the law of conservation of energy.
If the universe full of energy popped into existence then what must have been there before that moment? Some kind of source providing that energy.
And what else would be necessary for the creation of a fine-tuned universe
fit for life with all its universal laws and
specified complexity?
Space, time, matter, and energy popped into existence at the same instant in complete harmony.
What caused this to happen? Blind and mindless
naturalistic processes or mindful
intelligent design?
The answer is plain and simple, but that answer is not what certain people would like to hear or believe.
This has led to some of the most deluded theories to date...
Atheist delusion

Atheists
Our universe could have popped into existence 13.7 billion years ago without any divine help whatsoever, researchers say. ...
In the very weird world of quantum mechanics, which describes action on a subatomic scale, random fluctuations can produce matter and energy out of nothingness.
And this can lead to very big things indeed, researchers say.
The reality is that science can say absolutely nothing about what caused the creation event of the universe.
It is far beyond the limits of science. Hence the use of philosophical statements involving the denial of God.
Of course the unprovable philosophy naturalism can never account for anything before the natural world simply because there was no natural world.
Anybody who believes that something, let alone everything, can come from nothing by means of nothing is simply
deluded. Here is what
Roger Penrose said about Stephen Hawking's
M-theory,
which stands symbol for the atheist's neverending quest for the so-called
theory of everything, or the atheist's search for the
Philosopher's Stone...
What is referred to as M-theory, isn't even a theory. It's a collection of ideas, hopes, aspirations. ...
The book is a bit misleading in that respect.
Here's something about Georges Lemaître, the inventor of the big bang theory...

Lemaître first voiced his proposal that the universe had expanded from an initial point, which he called the
"primeval atom" or "the Cosmic Egg, exploding at the moment of the creation",
a theme he developed further in a report published in the journal "Nature" later that year.
The Cosmic Egg is a mythological motif found in
creation myths of many cultures and civilizations.
In the Orphic cosmogony, the unaging
Chronos produced Aether and Chaos and made in divine Aether a
silvery egg, from which everything else appeared.
See Arche and
The Presocratic Philosophers.
Chronos is the god of
time which of course also plays a crucial role in the
evolutionary belief system.
The 'golden womb' or 'golden egg', is the source of the creation of the Universe or the manifested cosmos in Hindu philosophy.
See Hiranyagarbha.
Georges Lemaître was a
Catholic who invented the Big Bang theory calling it a "cosmic egg exploding".
Catholicism is literally drenched in all kinds of mythical and pagan traditions and beliefs.
Easter eggs for example.
Evolution is the egghead
religion of
atheists.
Nonsense remains nonsense even if spoken by very clever scientists.
Stephen Hawking - The Beginning of Time
Rich Halvorson - Questioning Cosmological Superstition
Hannes Alfvén - Cosmology: Myth or Science?
Mariano Artigas - The Mind of the Universe
William Lane Craig - The Origins of the Universe: Has Hawking Eliminated God
Science Against Evolution - The Hubble Variable
Earth History - Water everywhere
Videos...
Stephen Hawking co-scientist Roger Penrose debunks M-theory
Henry Schaefer - The Kalam Cosmological Argument (Scientific Evidence)
Rich Halvorson - Questioning Cosmological Superstition
Hannes Alfvén - Cosmology: Myth or Science?
Mariano Artigas - The Mind of the Universe
William Lane Craig - The Origins of the Universe: Has Hawking Eliminated God
Science Against Evolution - The Hubble Variable
Earth History - Water everywhere
Videos...
Stephen Hawking co-scientist Roger Penrose debunks M-theory
Henry Schaefer - The Kalam Cosmological Argument (Scientific Evidence)